1985 Citroen BX vs. 1984 Volvo 240
To start off, 1985 Citroen BX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,141 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Citroen BX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Citroen BX (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1984 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Citroen BX should accelerate faster than 1984 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Volvo 240 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1985 Citroen BX.
Because 1985 Citroen BX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Citroen BX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Citroen BX (294 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Volvo 240. (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1985 Citroen BX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Citroen BX | 1984 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | BX | 240 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2141 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 294 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2660 mm |
