1985 Citroen BX vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen BX would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1985 Citroen BX. (62 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen BX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 239 kg more than 1985 Citroen BX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Citroen BX. (109 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Citroen BX.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Citroen BX | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | BX | 6 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1359 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 109 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 68 L |