1985 Citroen CX vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1985 Citroen CX is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1985 Citroen CX. (137 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen CX.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Citroen CX. (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Citroen CX | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | CX | XK |
Year Released | 1985 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2600 mm |