1985 Citroen CX vs. 1964 Volvo P 210 Duett
To start off, 1985 Citroen CX is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo P 210 Duett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo P 210 Duett would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Citroen CX (137 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1964 Volvo P 210 Duett. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo P 210 Duett.
Because 1964 Volvo P 210 Duett is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volvo P 210 Duett. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Citroen CX (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo P 210 Duett. (145 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1985 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo P 210 Duett.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Citroen CX | 1964 Volvo P 210 Duett | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | CX | P 210 Duett |
Year Released | 1985 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2610 mm |