1985 Citroen CX vs. 1966 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1985 Citroen CX is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Citroen CX (137 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1966 Ford Falcon. (106 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Falcon.
Because 1966 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Citroen CX (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Falcon. (188 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1985 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Citroen CX | 1966 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | CX | Falcon |
Year Released | 1985 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2782 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2720 mm |