1985 Citroen CX vs. 1975 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1985 Citroen CX is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Citroen CX (137 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 2101.
Because 1975 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Citroen CX (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 2101. (88 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1985 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Citroen CX | 1975 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | CX | 2101 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1975 |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 206 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2430 mm |
