1985 Citroen CX vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Citroen CX (137 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Citroen CX (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1985 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Citroen CX | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | CX | Midge |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 206 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
