1985 Citroen CX vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1985 Citroen CX. (114 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Citroen CX weights approximately 232 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 1985 Citroen CX (177 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1985 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1985 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1985 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Citroen CX | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | CX | Equator |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3260 mm |
