1985 Citroen CX vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1985 Citroen CX. (114 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Citroen CX weights approximately 151 kg more than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Citroen CX (177 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 1985 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Citroen CX | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
Make | Citroen | Seat |
Model | CX | Arosa |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1289 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2850 mm |