1985 Citroen CX vs. 2003 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2003 Mazda MPV is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda MPV (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1985 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda MPV weights approximately 415 kg more than 1985 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda MPV (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Citroen CX. (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Citroen CX | 2003 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | MPV |
Year Released | 1985 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |