1985 Citroen CX vs. 2010 BMW M3
To start off, 2010 BMW M3 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen CX would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 1985 Citroen CX. (137 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen CX.
Because 2010 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Citroen CX. (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Citroen CX | 2010 BMW M3 | |
Make | Citroen | BMW |
Model | CX | M3 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 414 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 8300 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4615 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1803 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1392 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2761 mm |