1985 Citroen CX vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen CX would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1985 Citroen CX. (168 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 286 kg more than 1985 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford E-Series is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford E-Series. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Citroen CX. (300 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Citroen CX. 2013 Ford E-Series has automatic transmission and 1985 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1985 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford E-Series will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Citroen CX | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | CX | E-Series |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 474 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 9.06:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 25 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1494 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2111 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3505 mm |
