1985 Citroen GSA vs. 2006 Mazda 2
To start off, 2006 Mazda 2 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 2 (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1985 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 2 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1985 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Citroen GSA | 2006 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | GSA | 2 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 45 L |