1985 Citroen GSA vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 2 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1985 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 2 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1985 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Citroen GSA | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | GSA | 2 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 43 L |