1985 Citroen LNA vs. 1996 Fiat Armadillo
To start off, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen LNA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen LNA would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1985 Citroen LNA. (35 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Armadillo should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen LNA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Armadillo weights approximately 664 kg more than 1985 Citroen LNA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (200 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Citroen LNA. (50 Nm). This means 1996 Fiat Armadillo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Citroen LNA. 1996 Fiat Armadillo has automatic transmission and 1985 Citroen LNA has manual transmission. 1985 Citroen LNA will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Fiat Armadillo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Citroen LNA | 1996 Fiat Armadillo | |
| Make | Citroen | Fiat |
| Model | LNA | Armadillo |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 652 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 50 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1374 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 1850 mm |
