1985 Citroen LNA vs. 2005 Kia K2700

To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen LNA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen LNA would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia K2700 (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1985 Citroen LNA. (35 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia K2700 should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen LNA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 820 kg more than 1985 Citroen LNA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Citroen LNA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Citroen LNA. (50 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Citroen LNA.

Compare all specifications: