1985 Citroen LNA vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen LNA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen LNA would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 741 kg more than 1985 Citroen LNA.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Citroen LNA. (50 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Citroen LNA.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Citroen LNA | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | LNA | C30 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 50 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 60 L |