1985 Daihatsu Rocky vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 1985 Daihatsu Rocky is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden HD (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1985 Daihatsu Rocky. (72 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden HD should accelerate faster than 1985 Daihatsu Rocky. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Daihatsu Rocky weights approximately 360 kg more than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1985 Daihatsu Rocky is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Daihatsu Rocky will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Daihatsu Rocky. (171 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Daihatsu Rocky.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Daihatsu Rocky | 1966 Holden HD | |
Make | Daihatsu | Holden |
Model | Rocky | HD |
Year Released | 1985 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2765 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |