1985 Dodge 600 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1985 Dodge 600. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1985 Dodge 600.
Because 2012 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Dodge 600. (180 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Dodge 600 | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | 600 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
