1985 Dodge Charger vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 1985 Dodge Charger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Dodge Charger (62 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Charger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Dodge Charger (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1985 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Dodge Charger | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Dodge | Volvo |
| Model | Charger | 66 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 117 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
