1985 Dodge Charger vs. 1981 Mazda 626
To start off, 1985 Dodge Charger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Dodge Charger weights approximately 5 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Because 1981 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Charger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Dodge Charger | 1981 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Charger | 626 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2520 mm |