1985 Dodge Charger vs. 2000 Proton 400
To start off, 2000 Proton 400 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Proton 400 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1985 Dodge Charger. (62 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 1985 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Dodge Charger weights approximately 80 kg more than 2000 Proton 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Dodge Charger (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1985 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Dodge Charger | 2000 Proton 400 | |
Make | Dodge | Proton |
Model | Charger | 400 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2510 mm |