1985 Dodge Colt vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Dodge Colt (87 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Dodge Colt weights approximately 70 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Dodge Colt (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (141 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1985 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Dodge Colt | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Colt | 2 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 141 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2500 mm |
