1985 Dodge Colt vs. 2006 Acura RSX
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (155 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1985 Dodge Colt. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1985 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura RSX weights approximately 124 kg more than 1985 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RSX (188 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Dodge Colt. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Dodge Colt | 2006 Acura RSX | |
Make | Dodge | Acura |
Model | Colt | RSX |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2580 mm |