1985 Dodge Colt vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Dodge Colt (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Dodge Colt weights approximately 550 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Dodge Colt (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1985 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Dodge Colt | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | Dodge | Tata |
Model | Colt | Nano |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2230 mm |