1985 Dodge Lancer vs. 1978 Volvo 264
To start off, 1985 Dodge Lancer is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 264. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 264 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 264 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 264 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1985 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 264 should accelerate faster than 1985 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Volvo 264 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1985 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Volvo 264 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 264. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Dodge Lancer | 1978 Volvo 264 | |
| Make | Dodge | Volvo |
| Model | Lancer | 264 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |
