1985 Dodge Lancer vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1985 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1985 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 414 kg more than 1985 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Dodge Lancer | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Dodge | Cadillac |
| Model | Lancer | CTS |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2890 mm |
