1985 Dodge Lancer vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (221 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1985 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1985 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 609 kg more than 1985 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Dodge Lancer | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Lancer | CLS |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2860 mm |