1985 Dodge Shadow vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 1985 Dodge Shadow is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1985 Dodge Shadow. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 1985 Dodge Shadow. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 424 kg more than 1985 Dodge Shadow. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Dodge Shadow | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
| Make | Dodge | Hudson |
| Model | Shadow | Super Wasp |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1599 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3030 mm |
