1985 Dodge Shadow vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre 4
To start off, 1985 Dodge Shadow is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Dodge Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Dodge Shadow (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. (70 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Shadow should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Dodge Shadow weights approximately 378 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Dodge Shadow | 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 | |
Make | Dodge | Reliant |
Model | Shadow | Sabre 4 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2290 mm |