1985 Dodge Shadow vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1985 Dodge Shadow is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Dodge Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1985 Dodge Shadow. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1985 Dodge Shadow. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Dodge Shadow weights approximately 585 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 1964 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Dodge Shadow | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Shadow | Elan |
Year Released | 1985 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2140 mm |