1985 Dodge Shadow vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1985 Dodge Shadow is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 187 kg more than 1985 Dodge Shadow.
Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Dodge Shadow | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Shadow | Cougar |
Year Released | 1985 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4728 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2830 mm |