1985 Dodge Shadow vs. 1972 Ford Maverick

To start off, 1985 Dodge Shadow is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Maverick weights approximately 85 kg more than 1985 Dodge Shadow.

Because 1972 Ford Maverick is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Maverick. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1985 Dodge Shadow 1972 Ford Maverick
Make Dodge Ford
Model Shadow Maverick
Year Released 1985 1972
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2212 cc 2782 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 81 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1175 kg 1260 kg
Vehicle Length 4370 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2800 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]