1985 Dodge Shadow vs. 2010 Ascari KZ1
To start off, 2010 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Dodge Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Dodge Shadow would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ascari KZ1 (500 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 404 more horse power than 1985 Dodge Shadow. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ascari KZ1 should accelerate faster than 1985 Dodge Shadow. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ascari KZ1 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1985 Dodge Shadow. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ascari KZ1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ascari KZ1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Dodge Shadow | 2010 Ascari KZ1 | |
Make | Dodge | Ascari |
Model | Shadow | KZ1 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4941 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 500 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1852 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2636 mm |