1985 Dodge Shadow vs. 2010 Bentley Continental GTC

To start off, 2010 Bentley Continental GTC is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Dodge Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Dodge Shadow would be higher. At 5,998 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Bentley Continental GTC is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Bentley Continental GTC weights approximately 1310 kg more than 1985 Dodge Shadow.

Because 2010 Bentley Continental GTC is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Dodge Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Bentley Continental GTC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1985 Dodge Shadow 2010 Bentley Continental GTC
Make Dodge Bentley
Model Shadow Continental GTC
Year Released 1985 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2500 cc 5998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type in-line W
Horse Power 0 HP 552 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front AWD
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1175 kg 2485 kg
Vehicle Length 4370 mm 4803 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1928 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2746 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]