1985 Dodge Shadow vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Dodge Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Dodge Shadow would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1985 Dodge Shadow. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1985 Dodge Shadow. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 627 kg more than 1985 Dodge Shadow. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Dodge Shadow | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Dodge | Cadillac |
Model | Shadow | STS |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1802 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1844 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2957 mm |