1985 Dodge Shadow vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Dodge Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Dodge Shadow would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Dodge Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 473 kg more than 1985 Dodge Shadow.
Because 2012 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Dodge Shadow | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Shadow | Falcon |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1648 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1868 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2838 mm |