1985 Fiat Croma vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 2,490 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1985 Fiat Croma. (44 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1985 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 70 kg more than 1985 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (171 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Fiat Croma. (127 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Fiat Croma | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Croma | Tempo |
Year Released | 1985 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2490 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 171 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2540 mm |