1985 Fiat Panda vs. 1984 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1985 Fiat Panda is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,270 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Nissan Pulsar (59 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1985 Fiat Panda. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1985 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 175 kg more than 1985 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Nissan Pulsar (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Fiat Panda. (58 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Fiat Panda | 1984 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Panda | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 1270 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 58 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2420 mm |
