1985 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 1985 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 640 kg more than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Fiat Ritmo | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Ritmo | Crestline |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 3929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2940 mm |
