1985 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1983 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1985 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Fiat Ritmo | 1983 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Fiat | Mercury |
Model | Ritmo | Cougar |
Year Released | 1985 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1929 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2650 mm |