1985 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1996 Mini MK VI
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,116 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Fiat Ritmo (53 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 220 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Fiat Ritmo (86 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1985 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Fiat Ritmo | 1996 Mini MK VI | |
Make | Fiat | Mini |
Model | Ritmo | MK VI |
Year Released | 1985 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 86 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2040 mm |