1985 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Artic (128 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Artic should accelerate faster than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 378 kg more than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Fiat Ritmo | 2000 Ford Artic | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Ritmo | Artic |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 128 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 68 L |
