1985 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Fiat Ritmo | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Fiat | Mercury |
Model | Ritmo | Sable |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1929 cc | 2984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2760 mm |