1985 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Falcon weights approximately 741 kg more than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. (86 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Fiat Ritmo | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | Falcon |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 86 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1581 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2930 mm |