1985 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Fiat Ritmo | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Fiat | Jaguar |
| Model | Ritmo | XF |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1929 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2909 mm |
