1985 Ford Capri vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1996 Mazda Midge is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Capri would be higher. At 1,593 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Capri is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford Capri weights approximately 72 kg more than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Because 1985 Ford Capri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Ford Capri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Capri | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Capri | Midge |
Year Released | 1985 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1044 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |