1985 Ford Fiesta vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1985 Ford Fiesta is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Fiesta | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fiesta | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1985 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 957 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2210 mm |