1985 Ford Fiesta vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1985 Ford Fiesta has manual transmission. 1985 Ford Fiesta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Fiesta | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Fiesta | ATS |
Year Released | 1985 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 957 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 199 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1418 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2776 mm |