1985 Ford Mustang vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 1985 Ford Mustang is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Riley RM A weights approximately 55 kg more than 1985 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Ford Mustang | 1951 Riley RM A | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Mustang | RM A |
Year Released | 1985 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2870 mm |